With the help of many experts and stakeholders, we contributed to key science products that assessed the health of the systems and species we are focused on, and identified priority areas for their conservation. Though the initial focus of the Arid Lands Initiative is within eastern Washington, these science products extend beyond Washington State boundaries, following the natural extension of the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion.
We assessed the health of the ecosystems and species that characterize eastern Washington’s arid lands, with the help of experts and stakeholders living and working in the region. This assessment produced a clear picture that encourages conservation action across this landscape. Although these systems and species have undergone varying degrees of degradation that compromises their ability to provide wildlife habitat and economic goods and services, their recovery and restoration is still achievable.
Download the Viability Assessment
A key emphasis of the science supporting the Arid Lands Initiative’s strategy was to identify priority areas to conserve, where we agreed action needs to happen first. We identified shared priority areas based on two analyses developed specifically for the Columbia Plateau ecoregion, with the input and interpretation from the ALI partners:
We integrated information from these two scientific bodies of work and selected a set of priority areas across the ecoregion to focus our work in. These priority areas included both core habitat patches and important linkages for keeping those core patches connected. [include the maps of core areas, connectivity, and priority areas map]. Since agreeing on these shared priority areas, the ALI partners have been integrating these shared priorities into our work in the Columbia Plateau landscape.
The landscape scale science products provide useful information for land owners and managers making decisions that affect how their lands and resources contribute to the larger landscape, and for others making decisions on how to focus their efforts across this broad landscape. To facilitate the use of these science products we developed a set of decision-support tools that share the existing information in useful ways. These tools include:
A climate change vulnerability assessment, that ranks each priority area relative to other priority areas, based on factors related to their exposure to changes in climate, the vulnerability of the habitats and species that occur there to changes in climate, and characteristics that would support those habitats and species’ capacity to adapt to changes in climate.
Scorecards for each priority area, that give users a map of a particular priority area with a summary of ecological information useful for decision makers and land owners. The scorecards show how that priority area ranks relative to others in terms of abundance of our priority systems and species; how impacted it currently is by factors such as fire and invasive species, the potential for impacts from future activities like development, wind power, or agricultural conversion; and how vulnerable the area is to future changes in climate.
Summary maps of which priority areas need immediate attention for maintaining and restoring the condition of priority systems and species, and similar maps that provide important lenses – such as climate change or wildfire potential – to inform our initial focus.
With the completion of these decision-support products, the Arid Lands Initiative is transitioning from landscape planning to taking coordinated action guided by our shared priorities, to achieve landscape-scale conservation in eastern Washington’s arid lands.